Hon’ble the Chief Minister finally granted approval for the creation of a new plot No. But since three adjoining plots of ½ acres were not available, the sanction was taken from higher authorities for bifurcation of Plot N. Vide order dated, the allotment committee recommended the allotment of 3 adjoining plots of ½ acre to respondent No. 2 had applied for an industrial plot for an area of 1100 sq meter in the year 2004 and had deposited the earnest money along with the application form. Yadav moved an application under Section 22 of Haryana State Legal Authority Act (for short ‘the Act’) before the Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Gurgaon on for a direction to the respondents/petitioner to charge Rs.900/- per sq meter instead of Rs.1800/- per sq meter.Ĥ. Brief facts of the case are that respondent No. The above said petitions have been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuing a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned award dated (P-3) passed by respondent No. However, for the facility of reference, the facts are being taken from C.W.P No. 19352 to 19357 of 2010 as common question of facts are involved in all these petitions. Ritu Bahri, J.: - This order shall dispose of the above six petitions i.e C.W.P Nos.
0 kommentar(er)
